Uzamere v. Uzamere

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Uzamere v. Uzamere

68 A.D.3d 855, 889 N.Y.2d 495

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 A.D.3d 855 (Uzamere v. Uzamere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Uzamere v. Uzamere, 68 A.D.3d 855, 889 N.Y.2d 495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of her motion which was for an award of child support since the subject child had reached the age of 21 and there was no express agreement to pay such support (see Matter of Winokur v Winokur, 31 AD3d 653 [2006]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of her motion which was for an award of child support since the subject child had reached the age of 21 and there was no express agreement to pay such support (see Matter of Winokur v Winokur, 31 AD3d 653 [2006]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.3d 855, 889 N.Y.2d 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uzamere-v-uzamere-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack