Uzamere v. Uzamere
68 A.D.3d 855, 889 N.Y.2d 495
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 8, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of her motion which was for an award of child support since the subject child had reached the age of 21 and there was no express agreement to pay such support (see Matter of Winokur v Winokur, 31 AD3d 653 [2006]).
The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Uzamere v. Uzamere, 68 A.D.3d 855, 889 N.Y.2d 495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 855 (Uzamere v. Uzamere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Uzamere v. Hochul
2025 NY Slip Op 04124 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)