Uyeno v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Uyeno v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 374, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 360

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 2, 1948

DocketNo. 7525; Entry No. 5896

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Cust. Ct. 374 (Uyeno v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Uyeno v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 374, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 360 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Tilson, Judge:

In submitting this appeal for decision counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the unit invoice values of this merchandise, plus the cost- A packing represent the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States; that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise was not higher, and the record in United States v. Nippon Dry Goods Co., Reap. Dec. 5006, has been admitted in evidence herein.

Upon the agreed facts and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the unit invoice values, plus packing. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tilson, Judge:

In submitting this appeal for decision counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the unit invoice values of this merchandise, plus the cost- A packing represent the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States; that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise was not higher, and the record in United States v. Nippon Dry Goods Co., Reap. Dec. 5006, has been admitted in evidence herein.

Upon the agreed facts and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the unit invoice values, plus packing. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Cust. Ct. 374, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uyeno-v-united-states-cusc-1948.