Uwazih v. Schierwagen
This text of Uwazih v. Schierwagen (Uwazih v. Schierwagen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1705
ADELINE UWAZIH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JEFFREY SCHIERWAGEN; HILDA M. BARG; CARL M. BARG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-1369-A)
Submitted: December 17, 2002 Decided: January 15, 2003
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John O. Iweanoge, Rosslyn, Virginia, for Appellant. Steven Mark Levine, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Adeline Uwazih appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her diversity-based personal injury suit for lack of jurisdiction.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Uwazih v. Schierwagen, No. CA-01-1369-A (E.D. Va. filed June 18,
2002; entered June 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Uwazih v. Schierwagen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uwazih-v-schierwagen-ca4-2003.