Uvalde Paving Co. v. Davis

269 S.W. 450
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 19, 1925
DocketNo. 158.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 S.W. 450 (Uvalde Paving Co. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Uvalde Paving Co. v. Davis, 269 S.W. 450 (Tex. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

BARCUS, J.

This was an injunction suit filed by appellees as trustees of common school district No. 42 in Limestone county, against appellant, seeking to enjoin appellants from closing the X-All Highway .in Limestone county. A temporary restraining order was granted in chambers by the court when the petition was presented to him. Appellant in due time filed its plea of privilege in statutory form, claiming its privilege to be sued, if at all, in Dallas county. There was no controverting affidavit filed to the plea of privilege. The judgment of the trial court overruling the plea of privilege recites that it was heard with all parties present and after the plaintiff had been given notice thereof. The court overruled the plea of privilege and refused to transfer the cause, to - which the appellant excepted and gave notice of appeal, and it is from this order and judgment the appeal is perfected.

The appellee having filed no controverting affidavit, and the plea of privilege of appellant having been in statutory form, the trial court should have sustained same. Where the defendant in the trial court files a plea of privilege, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to both plead and prove such facts as will give the trial court jurisdiction, and, in the absence of pleading and proof on the part of the plaintiff, it is the duty of the trial court to sustain the plea of privilege and transfer the cause to the county of the residence of the defendant. Randals v. Green (Tex. Civ. App.) 258 S. W. 529; Coalson v. Holmes, 111 Tex. 502, 240 S. W. 896; Bennett v. Rose Mfg. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 226 S. W. 143.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to sustain the plea of privilege and transfer the cause to Dallas county.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yates v. State
3 S.W.2d 114 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 S.W. 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uvalde-paving-co-v-davis-texapp-1925.