Utto Inc. v. Metrotech Corp.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Utto Inc. v. Metrotech Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 F.4th 984
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 13, 2023·No. 23-1435·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-1435 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 03/13/2023

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

UTTO INC., Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

METROTECH CORP., aka Vivax-Metrotech, Defendant-Appellee ______________________

2023-1435 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:22-cv-01904-WHO, Judge William H. Orrick, III. ______________________

ORDER The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same Case: 23-1435 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 03/13/2023

hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

March 13, 2023 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 13, 2023

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Utto Inc. v. Metrotech Corp., (Fed. Cir. 2023).

Utto Inc. v. Metrotech Corp. (Utto Inc. v. Metrotech Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.