Utt v. Department of Highways
This text of 14 Ct. Cl. 236 (Utt v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the evening of April 4, 1982, claimant was operating his 1982 Oldsmobile Toronado easterly on State Route 22 (also [237]*237known as Cove Road) in Weirton, West Virginia, a road owned and maintained by the respondent. As the claimant was turning onto Harmon Creek Road, a two-lane secondary road, the right front wheel of his automobile struck a pothole, damaging the hubcap and rim in the amount of $142.00.
According to the claimant’s testimony, he had been travelling at a speed of 25 mph and was familiar with the road in question. On prior occasions, he had observed the pothole, but made no complaints to the Department of Highways.
It is well established law in West Virginia that the State cannot and does not guarantee the safety of motorists upon its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). To be held liable, the respondent must have had either actual or constructive notice of the hazardous condition of the highway. No such evidence of notice was presented in this case; therefore, the respondent cannot be held negligent, and the Court must disallow the claim.
Claim disallowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Ct. Cl. 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/utt-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1982.