Utopia Equip., Inc. v. ELRAC, Inc.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJuly 21, 2017
Docket2017 NYSlipOp 50949(U)
StatusPublished

This text of Utopia Equip., Inc. v. ELRAC, Inc. (Utopia Equip., Inc. v. ELRAC, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Utopia Equip., Inc. v. ELRAC, Inc., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

<partyblock>

<br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Utopia Equipment, Inc., as Assignee of Connell Kydron, Appellant,  

<br><br>against<br><br>ELRAC, Inc., Doing Business as Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Respondent.

</font></b></div><br><br>

<p>

Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Irena Golodkeyer, Esq.), for appellant.

Carman, Callahan &amp; Ingham, LLP (Jeffrey P. Saxon, Esq.), for respondent.

</p>

<p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered April 8, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p>

<p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p>

<p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor failed to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs).</p>

<p>Plaintiff's argument lacks merit, as the letters clearly apprised the assignor that they were being sent on behalf of defendant's claims processing company, to whom plaintiff's assignor had submitted the NF-2 application for no-fault benefits (<i>see W.H.O. Acupuncture, P.C. v Travelers Home &amp; Mar. Ins. Co.</i>, 36 Misc 3d 152[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 51707[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2012]; <a href="../2010/2010_51057.htm" target="_blank"><i>Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v Utica Mut. Ins. Co.</i>, 27 Misc 3d 142</a>[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 51057[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2010]). In addition, contrary to plaintiff's contention, the affirmation defendant submitted from the doctor who was to perform the IMEs of plaintiff's assignor was sufficient to establish that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for the scheduled IMEs (<a href="../2006/2006_09604.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720</a> [2006]; <a href="../2016/2016_51327.htm" target="_blank"><i>TAM Med. Supply Corp. v Tri State Consumers Ins. Co.</i>, 53 Misc 3d 128</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51350[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2016];<a href="../2012/2012_51628.htm" target="_blank"><i> Quality Psychological Servs., P.C. v Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co.</i>, 36 Misc 3d 146</a>[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 51628[U] [App Term, 2d <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2012]).</p>

<p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p>

<p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p>

<br>ENTER:

<br>Paul Kenny

<br>Chief Clerk

<p>Decision Date: July 21, 2017</p>

<br><br><div align="center">

<form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml">

<input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List">

</form>

</div>

</partyblock>

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
35 A.D.3d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Utopia Equip., Inc. v. ELRAC, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/utopia-equip-inc-v-elrac-inc-nyappterm-2017.