Utnicki v. City of New York

285 A.D. 1069, 139 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6694
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 11, 1955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

-In this action to recover damages for the wrongful death of respondent’s intestate, her late husband, and for his conscious pain and suffering, order granting respondent’s motion for a trial preference affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appellant does not dispute respondent’s assertion that she and her young child have been depending upon neighbors and friends for clothing and food, and that she has no means, no income, no relatives who can assist her, and is unable to work because of the necessity for care of her child. This constitutes destitution, notwithstanding that respondent is not on relief. Therefore, the granting of the preference herein was a proper exercise of discretion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Utnicki v. City of New York, 285 A.D. 1069, 139 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

285 A.D. 1069 (Utnicki v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marquardt v. McLean
23 Misc. 2d 998 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)