Utley v. . Peters
72 N.C. 525
Opinion
If we felt at liberty to decide the case, we would probably have to take the facts in the case to be as stated by the defendant in her affidavit; and so taking them, the merits would seem to be in her favor. Rut, as we said in Clegg v. N. Y. Soap Stone Co., 66 N. C. R. 391, and numerous other eases since, the facts must be found below. To this end the cause will be remanded. Neither party will recover costs in this Court.
Pee Cuuiam. Case remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Utley v. . Peters, 72 N.C. 525 (N.C. 1875).
72 N.C. 525 (Utley v. . Peters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rhodes v. . Rhodes
34 S.E. 271 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
Bacon v. . Johnson
14 S.E. 508 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)