Utility Construction Co. v. Borough of South River
57 A.2d 389, 136 N.J.L. 633, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 283
Opinion
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Colie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Utility Construction Co. v. Borough of South River, 57 A.2d 389, 136 N.J.L. 633, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 283 (N.J. 1948).
57 A.2d 389 (Utility Construction Co. v. Borough of South River) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oberg v. City of Los Angeles
281 P.2d 591 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)