Utica Sheet Metal Corp. v. County of Tompkins

40 A.D.2d 567, 333 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4068
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 6, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 40 A.D.2d 567 (Utica Sheet Metal Corp. v. County of Tompkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Utica Sheet Metal Corp. v. County of Tompkins, 40 A.D.2d 567, 333 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered May 26, 1972 in Tompkins County, which adjudged Utica Sheet Metal Corp. as the lowest responsible bidder on a construction contract. Tompkins Cortland Community College solicited bids for the construction of a new college. Appellant Levi-Case Company, Inc., and respondent Utica Sheet Metal Corp., among others, submitted bids on the heating, ventilating and air-conditioning. The base bid provided for a gas heating system and, as an alternate system, bids were sought for an all electric heating system. Combining the base bid and alternate bid of Levi-Case makes it the lowest bidder whereas the lowest base bid was made by Utica Sheet Metal. Upon informal information that the bid was going to be awarded to Levi-Case, Utica Sheet Metal brought an article 78 proceeding which resulted in a favorable judgment. For several reasons the judgment must be reversed. The application is premature since no formal award has been made, Levi-Case was a necessary party in the proceeding as the alleged successful bidder (Matter of Cestone Bros., v. Solowinski, 276 App. Div. 970), and, while the court below rendered no written decision, the record in its present form demonstrates that the petition of Utica Sheet Metal has no legal basis (Matter of Sweet Assoc. v. Gallman, 36 A D 2d 95, 99; Matter of Bielec Wrecking & Lbr. Co. v. McMorran, 21 A D 2d [568]*568949, 951). Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Simons, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v. City of Buffalo School District
48 A.D.3d 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Boston Culinary Group, Inc. v. New York State Olympic Regional Development Authority
18 A.D.3d 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Subolo Contracting Corp. v. County of Westchester
282 A.D.2d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Marzella v. Munroe
123 A.D.2d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
New York State Ass'n of Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors, Inc. v. Egan
86 A.D.2d 100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.2d 567, 333 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/utica-sheet-metal-corp-v-county-of-tompkins-nyappdiv-1972.