Utica Mutual Insurance v. Lowry

208 A.D.2d 636, 618 N.Y.S.2d 232, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9515
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 11, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay the arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Miller, J.), dated [637] February 1, 1993, which granted the petition and permanently stayed the arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant failed to demonstrate that he had diligently sought to determine whether the offending vehicle was insured. Thus, the court correctly stayed the arbitration since the appellant did not comply with the provision in his insurance policy that he give notice of any uninsured motorist claims within 90 days of the accident or as soon as practicable (see, State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Romero, 109 AD2d 786). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Utica Mutual Insurance v. Lowry, 208 A.D.2d 636, 618 N.Y.S.2d 232, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

208 A.D.2d 636 (Utica Mutual Insurance v. Lowry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. Melay
271 A.D.2d 449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Leong
250 A.D.2d 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)