Utica Hydraulic Cement Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

193 Ill. App. 390, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 658
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 15, 1915·No. Gen. No. 6,047·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Railroads, § 919*—when defendant has burden of showing fire not caused by sparks from locomotive. Evidence of circumstances justifying an inference that a fire which consumed a building was caused by burning cinders or sparks emitted from the defendant’s passing locomotive, establishes a prima facie case which, under the statute, casts on the defendant the burden of proving such facts as would excuse it. 6. Instructions, § 151*—when not error to refuse instruction. There is no error in refusing requested instructions which are covered by other instructions actually given.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Utica Hydraulic Cement Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co., 193 Ill. App. 390, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 658 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

193 Ill. App. 390 (Utica Hydraulic Cement Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R. A. Watson Orchards, Inc. v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
250 Ill. App. 22 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)