Utica Gas & Electric Co. v. Merry

239 A.D. 751, 263 N.Y.S. 277

Opinions

[752] Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements as to each appeal. The contract constitutes an illegal waste because prohibited by section 128-a of the Village Law, added by chapter 852 of the Laws of 1928. " The purchase price is a debt of the village. (Newell v. People, 7 N. Y. 9.) Subdivision 37 of section 89 of the Village Law is especially made subject to other provisions of the Village Law and is, therefore, subject to section 128-a {supra). The expenditure was not included in the budget and there was no resolution to borrow on bonds or other obligations. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents in an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Utica Gas & Electric Co. v. Merry, 239 A.D. 751, 263 N.Y.S. 277 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

239 A.D. 751 (Utica Gas & Electric Co. v. Merry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Western New York Water Co. v. City of Buffalo
151 N.E. 207 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
Newell v. People Ex Rel. Phelps
7 N.Y. 9 (New York Court of Appeals, 1852)
Brownell v. . Town of Greenwich
22 N.E. 24 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Ketchum v. . the City of Buffalo and Austin
14 N.Y. 356 (New York Court of Appeals, 1856)
Wells v. . Town of Salina
23 N.E. 870 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Scott v. Twombley
20 A.D. 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
People ex rel. Percival v. Cram
50 A.D. 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)