Utica City National Bank v. Doring
This text of 36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612 (Utica City National Bank v. Doring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— So much of the judgment appealed from as declares void and sets aside the four judgments in favor of the defendant Sylvester Doring, as committee, [613]*613etc., is reversed and a new trial ordered as to tlie issues respecting said judgments, with costs to abide event, and the residue of the judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs as against the’ defendants other than the said committee. Opinion by Barker, J.; dissenting opinion by Hardin, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/utica-city-national-bank-v-doring-nysupct-1883.