Utica City National Bank v. Doring

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1883
StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612 (Utica City National Bank v. Doring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Utica City National Bank v. Doring, 36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1883).

Opinion

— So much of the judgment appealed from as declares void and sets aside the four judgments in favor of the defendant Sylvester Doring, as committee, [613]*613etc., is reversed and a new trial ordered as to tlie issues respecting said judgments, with costs to abide event, and the residue of the judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs as against the’ defendants other than the said committee. Opinion by Barker, J.; dissenting opinion by Hardin, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/utica-city-national-bank-v-doring-nysupct-1883.