Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Leavitt

72 F.3d 139, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39871, 1995 WL 716279
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Leavitt. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 F.3d 564
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided November 22, 1995·No. 94-4170·Published

Opinion

72 F.3d 139w

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

UTAH WOMEN'S CLINIC, INC.; Edward R. Watson, M.D.; Madhuri
Shah, M.D.; Laurel Shepherd, M.D.; Alissa Porter; Wendy
Edwards; Wasatch Women's Center, P.C.; William R. Adams,
M.D.; Denise Defa and Sarah Roe, on behalf of herself and
all other similarly situated women from Utah and surrounding
states, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Michael LEAVITT, Governor of the State of Utah, in his
individual and official capacities; Jan Graham, Attorney
General of Utah, in her individual and official capacities;
and their successors, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-4170.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 22, 1995.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Leavitt, 72 F.3d 139, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39871, 1995 WL 716279 (10th Cir. 1995).

72 F.3d 139 (Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Leavitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.