Utah v. Baxter
90 N.E.2d 66, 300 N.Y. 610, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1464
This text of 90 N.E.2d 66 (Utah v. Baxter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Utah v. Baxter, 90 N.E.2d 66, 300 N.Y. 610, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1464 (N.Y. 1949).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the easement of the city, acquired by condemnation, to change the level of Lake Mahopac, is a substantial restriction on the use of the premises contracted to be sold. We pass on no other question. No opinion.
Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
90 N.E.2d 66, 300 N.Y. 610, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/utah-v-baxter-ny-1949.