Utah Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Nunley

411 P.2d 838, 17 Utah 2d 348, 1966 Utah LEXIS 473
Utah Supreme Court·Decided March 8, 1966·No. No. 10451·Published

Opinion

HENRIOD, Chief Justice.

Appeal from an award of attorneys fees, in a foreclosure action. Reversed as to. said award. Costs to appellants.

Counsel for both sides were present when the foreclosure matter was submitted on the record, part of which was a general denial of matters pleaded, including the amount of attorneys fees prayed for. No. evidence was offered as to the amount that should be awarded, nor was a specified amount prayed for or pleaded, but after counsel for defendants had left the courtroom, counsel for plaintiff suggested a fee consonant with a County Bar Association [349]*349schedule and the court awarded that amount without any evidence or sworn testimony other than as suggested.

We think our recent case of F. M. A. Financial Corp. v. Build, Inc., 17 Utah 2d 80, 404 P.2d 670 (1965), inescapably applies under the facts of this particular case, and that the attorneys fee award must be vacated. It is so adjudged.1

McDonough, crockett, wade and CALLISTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Utah Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Nunley, 411 P.2d 838, 17 Utah 2d 348, 1966 Utah LEXIS 473 (Utah 1966).

411 P.2d 838 (Utah Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Nunley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crouch v. Pixler
320 P.2d 943 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1958)
F. M. A. Financial Corp. v. Build, Inc.
404 P.2d 670 (Utah Supreme Court, 1965)