Home/New York Court of Appeals/U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines

U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines

142 N.E. 270, 236 N.Y. 528, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 947
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 8, 1923·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order affirming order denying motion to vacate service of summons affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. Order affirming order granting motion to amend summons affirmed, without costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not voting: His cock, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines, 142 N.E. 270, 236 N.Y. 528, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 947 (N.Y. 1923).

142 N.E. 270 (U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Acheson Graphite Co. v. Mellon
21 F.2d 562 (W.D. New York, 1927)
Rauch v. Hines
122 Misc. 393 (New York Supreme Court, 1924)
Lawrey v. . Hines
142 N.E. 576 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)