U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines

142 N.E. 270, 236 N.Y. 528, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 947
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 8, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 142 N.E. 270 (U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines, 142 N.E. 270, 236 N.Y. 528, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 947 (N.Y. 1923).

Opinion

Order affirming order denying motion to vacate service of summons affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. Order affirming order granting motion to amend summons affirmed, without costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not voting: His cock, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Acheson Graphite Co. v. Mellon
21 F.2d 562 (W.D. New York, 1927)
Rauch v. Hines
122 Misc. 393 (New York Supreme Court, 1924)
Lawrey v. . Hines
142 N.E. 576 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 N.E. 270, 236 N.Y. 528, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ut-hungerford-brass-and-copper-company-v-hines-ny-1923.