Usyk v. Track Side Blazers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Usyk v. Track Side Blazers, Inc.

182 A.D.2d 1125

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 24, 1992·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant Track Side Blazers, Inc., has abandoned the arguments that it made at Supreme Court in support of its motion for summary judgment. For the first time on appeal, Track Side Blazers con[1126] tends that it is entitled to summary judgment because it is shielded from liability pursuant to General Obligations Law §9-103. We decline to reach that contention because the record before us is insufficient to allow for meaningful review. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant Track Side Blazers, Inc., has abandoned the arguments that it made at Supreme Court in support of its motion for summary judgment. For the first time on appeal, Track Side Blazers con[1126] tends that it is entitled to summary judgment because it is shielded from liability pursuant to General Obligations Law §9-103. We decline to reach that contention because the record before us is insufficient to allow for meaningful review. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ.

Usyk v. Track Side Blazers, Inc., 182 A.D.2d 1125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

182 A.D.2d 1125 (Usyk v. Track Side Blazers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related