Home/Ohio Supreme Court/USX Corp. v. Penn Cent. Corp.

USX Corp. v. Penn Cent. Corp.

90 Ohio St. 3d 1408
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 11, 2000
Docket00-660
StatusPublished

This text of 90 Ohio St. 3d 1408 (USX Corp. v. Penn Cent. Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
USX Corp. v. Penn Cent. Corp., 90 Ohio St. 3d 1408 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 74755. On August 24, 2000, appellants filed a memorandum opposing motion to dismiss and a motion to strike motion to dismiss with the names of several attorneys listed as counsel. J. Michael Jarboe and Timothy W. Bergin are not admitted to practice in Ohio and have not sought admission pro hac vice as required by S.CtPrac.R. 1(1) and (2). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective September 8, 2000, that the names of J. Michael Jarboe and Timothy W. Bergin be, and hereby are, stricken from appellants’ memorandum opposing motion to dismiss and appellants’ motion to strike motion to dismiss, and they shall not be permitted to appear in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 Ohio St. 3d 1408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/usx-corp-v-penn-cent-corp-ohio-2000.