Ussery v. State
This text of 140 S.E. 427 (Ussery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Upon the trial of one charged with manufacturing whisky, a plea of autrefois convict, setting up that a few months previously the accused had been convicted of the offense of possessing whisky, and that the charge of possessing whisky, upon which he had been convicted, and the present charge of manufacturing whisky, were based upon the same facts and grew out of the same transaction, is insufficient in law and is not a good plea of autrefois convict. It is obvious that the greater offense of manufacturing whisky can not be merged into the lesser offense of possessing the whisky.
2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 427, 37 Ga. App. 345, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ussery-v-state-gactapp-1927.