Usry v. United States

545 F. App'x 265
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 6, 2013
DocketNo. 13-6818
StatusPublished

This text of 545 F. App'x 265 (Usry v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Usry v. United States, 545 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Barto Usry appeals the district court’s order rejecting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, Usry challenges the district court’s conclusion that his FTCA claim is barred by the discretionary function exception. See 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Usry v. United States, No. 5:11-cv-00141-FPSJES (ND.W.Va. Mar. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Exceptions
28 U.S.C. § 2680(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
545 F. App'x 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/usry-v-united-states-ca4-2013.