Usry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Usry v. State

539 S.W.3d 931

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2018·No. No. ED 105592·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kurt Usry appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kurt Usry appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Usry v. State, 539 S.W.3d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

539 S.W.3d 931 (Usry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.