Usry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Usry v. State

539 S.W.3d 931

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105592

StatusPublished

This text of 539 S.W.3d 931 (Usry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Usry v. State, 539 S.W.3d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kurt Usry appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kurt Usry appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 S.W.3d 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/usry-v-state-moctapp-2018.