Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Usry v. Bostick

Usry v. Bostick

147 S.E.2d 617, 113 Ga. App. 224, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 2, 1966
Docket41348
StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.E.2d 617 (Usry v. Bostick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Usry v. Bostick, 147 S.E.2d 617, 113 Ga. App. 224, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision of this court in Usry v. Bostick, 112 Ga. App. 76 (143 SE2d 781) having been reversed as to the holding in the third division by the Supreme Court in Bostick v. Usry, 221 Ga. 647 (146 SE2d 882) because of our erroneous construction of the language used by plaintiff’s counsel in his argument, the judgment heretofore entered as to that is vacated and the judgment of the trial court in denying a new trial is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, P. J., Eberhardt and Parnell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Usry v. Bostick
143 S.E.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Bostick v. Usry
146 S.E.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 S.E.2d 617, 113 Ga. App. 224, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/usry-v-bostick-gactapp-1966.