Usry v. Bostick
147 S.E.2d 617, 113 Ga. App. 224, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Usry v. Bostick. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Ga. App. 76 →
Opinion
The decision of this court in Usry v. Bostick, 112 Ga. App. 76 (143 SE2d 781) having been reversed as to the holding in the third division by the Supreme Court in Bostick v. Usry, 221 Ga. 647 (146 SE2d 882) because of our erroneous construction of the language used by plaintiff’s counsel in his argument, the judgment heretofore entered as to that is vacated and the judgment of the trial court in denying a new trial is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Usry v. Bostick, 147 S.E.2d 617, 113 Ga. App. 224, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).
147 S.E.2d 617 (Usry v. Bostick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Usry v. Bostick
143 S.E.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Bostick v. Usry
146 S.E.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)