Ushler v. State
This text of Ushler v. State (Ushler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
WILLIAM R. USHLER, § § Defendant Below, § No. 327, 2025 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 2204009600 (N) § Appellee. §
Submitted: November 5, 2025 Decided: December 30, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief and motion for
recusal, the appellee’s motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that
the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s order,
dated July 9, 2025, denying the appellant’s first motion for postconviction relief
under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61.1 The appellant’s motion to recuse a deputy
attorney general who did not file or appear on the appellee’s motion to affirm is
moot.
1 State v. Ushler, 2025 WL 1898104 (Del. Super. Ct. July 9, 2025). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED
and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. The motion for recusal is
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ushler v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ushler-v-state-del-2025.