Usacm Liquidating Trust v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Usacm Liquidating Trust v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP. Read the opinion of the Court — 754 F.3d 645
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 14, 2014·No. 11-15626·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

USACM LIQUIDATING TRUST, No. 11-15626 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. and 2:08-cv-00461- PMP-PAL USA CAPITAL DIVERSIFIED DEED FUND, LLC, Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE, Defendant-Appellee.

Filed March 14, 2014

Before: J. Clifford Wallace and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge.*

ORDER

The order, filed on February 18, 2014, is amended as follows:

* The Honorable Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. 2 USACM LIQUIDATING TRUST V. DELOITTE & TOUCHE

Page 3, lines 10–11, replace “No petitions for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc will be entertained.” with “Appellant shall have 14 days from the date of the amendment of this order to file a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Usacm Liquidating Trust v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP, (9th Cir. 2014).

Usacm Liquidating Trust v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP (Usacm Liquidating Trust v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.