Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/USAA Casualty Insurance v. Bejany

USAA Casualty Insurance v. Bejany

717 So. 2d 164, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11640, 1998 WL 635234
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 16, 1998
DocketNo. 98-2275
StatusPublished

This text of 717 So. 2d 164 (USAA Casualty Insurance v. Bejany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
USAA Casualty Insurance v. Bejany, 717 So. 2d 164, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11640, 1998 WL 635234 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order denying in part Petitioner’s motion for protective order, over Petitioner’s assertions of work product and attorney-client privilege. On remand, the trial court is required to hold an in camera inspection of the material at issue in order to rule on the applicability of the privileges asserted. See United Service Auto. Ass’n v. Crews, 614 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Walker, 583 So.2d 356, 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

DELL, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Crews
614 So. 2d 1213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Allstate Ins. Co., Inc. v. Walker
583 So. 2d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
717 So. 2d 164, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11640, 1998 WL 635234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/usaa-casualty-insurance-v-bejany-fladistctapp-1998.