USAA Casualty Insurance v. Bejany
717 So. 2d 164, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11640, 1998 WL 635234
Opinion
We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order denying in part Petitioner’s motion for protective order, over Petitioner’s assertions of work product and attorney-client privilege. On remand, the trial court is required to hold an in camera inspection of the material at issue in order to rule on the applicability of the privileges asserted. See United Service Auto. Ass’n v. Crews, 614 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Walker, 583 So.2d 356, 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
USAA Casualty Insurance v. Bejany, 717 So. 2d 164, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11640, 1998 WL 635234 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
717 So. 2d 164 (USAA Casualty Insurance v. Bejany) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Crews
614 So. 2d 1213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Allstate Ins. Co., Inc. v. Walker
583 So. 2d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)