USA V. CYNTHIA MONTOYA
This text of USA V. CYNTHIA MONTOYA (USA V. CYNTHIA MONTOYA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 14 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50129
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:20-cr-02914-LAB-1 v. Southern District of California, San Diego CYNTHIA LEON MONTOYA, ORDER Defendant-Appellant.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Judges Owens and Bumatay did not participate in the deliberations or vote in
this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
USA V. CYNTHIA MONTOYA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/usa-v-cynthia-montoya-ca9-2022.