USA, ex rel. v. UPMC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in USA, ex rel. v. UPMC. Read the opinion of the Court — 946 F.3d 162
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 20, 2019·No. 18-1693·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 18-1693

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.

J. WILLIAM BOOKWALTER, III, M.D.;

ROBERT J. SCLABASSI, M.D.; ANNA MITINA

v.

UPMC; UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS, d/b/a UPP DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSURGERY

J. WILLIAM BOOKWALTER, III, M.D.;

ROBERT J. SCLABASSI, M.D.; ANNA MITINA, Appellants

(W.D. Pa. No. 2:12-cv-00145)

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, and McKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, MATEY, PHIPPS, and FUENTES,* Circuit Judges

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellees in the above-captioned case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED IN PART. A majority of the judges who partici- pated in the decision of the Court having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by

* Judge FUENTES’s vote is limited to panel rehearing only.

the panel is GRANTED. The opinion and judgment filed September 17, 2019, are hereby VACATED. A subsequent opinion and judgment are herewith issued.

The majority has made changes to the language that appeared at pages 3–4, 6, 11, 15, 27–30, 32–33, 35–37, and 39–40 of the original opinion. Most of the material that appeared at pages 18–25 of the original opinion has been deleted. Judge AMBRO’s opinion concur- ring in the judgment has been withdrawn.

A majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the Court en banc is DENIED.

By the Court,

s/ Stephanos Bibas

Circuit Judge

Dated: December 20, 2019 NMR/cc: Patrick K. Cavanaugh, Esq.

Stephen J. Del Sole, Esq.

Gregory M. Simpson, Esq.

Andrew M. Stone, Esq.

Kirti Datla, Esq.

Jessica L. Ellsworth, Esq.

Sarah C. Marberg, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USA, ex rel. v. UPMC, (3d Cir. 2019).

USA, ex rel. v. UPMC (USA, ex rel. v. UPMC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.