U.S. Underwriters Insurance Company v. Gongregation B'nai Israel, Wessa Eskandar

101 F.3d 685, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39567, 1996 WL 280089
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 1996
Docket95-9164
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 F.3d 685 (U.S. Underwriters Insurance Company v. Gongregation B'nai Israel, Wessa Eskandar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. Underwriters Insurance Company v. Gongregation B'nai Israel, Wessa Eskandar, 101 F.3d 685, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39567, 1996 WL 280089 (2d Cir. 1996).

Opinion

101 F.3d 685

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23.
U.S. UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GONGREGATION B'NAI ISRAEL, Defendant-Appellant,
Wessa ESKANDAR, Defendant.

No. 95-9164.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 24, 1996.

Appearing for Appellant: Richard A. Finkel, Meissner, Kleinberg & Finkel, N.Y., N.Y.

Appearing for Appellee: Richard S. Sklarin, Thurm & Heller, N.Y., N.Y.

E.D.N.Y.

AFFIRMED.

Before: KEARSE, WINTER and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and was argued by counsel.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Gleeson's Memorandum and Order dated October 5, 1995. We have considered all of defendant-appellant's arguments that are properly before us on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Treadwell Corp.
58 F. Supp. 2d 77 (S.D. New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 F.3d 685, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39567, 1996 WL 280089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-underwriters-insurance-company-v-gongregation-b-ca2-1996.