U.S. Steel v. National Labor Relations Board

112 F. App'x 64
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedOctober 26, 2004
DocketNos. 03-1426, 04-1016
StatusPublished

This text of 112 F. App'x 64 (U.S. Steel v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. Steel v. National Labor Relations Board, 112 F. App'x 64 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. Insofar as the Petition for Review seeks modification of the Board’s order, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition be denied. Insofar as the Petition for Review seeks other relief, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Board’s Cross-Application for Enforcement of its order be granted.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 F. App'x 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-steel-v-national-labor-relations-board-cadc-2004.