US Sprint Communications Co. v. Cheney

5 F.3d 1503, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17930, 1993 WL 264957
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 15, 1993·No. 92-1470·Published

Opinion

5 F.3d 1503
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

U.S. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense and Andrew Card, Acting
Secretary of Transportation, Appellees,
and
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., Intervenor.

No. 92-1470.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 15, 1993.

Before (MAYER, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge):

Judgment

PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

US Sprint Communications Co. v. Cheney, 5 F.3d 1503, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17930, 1993 WL 264957 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

5 F.3d 1503 (US Sprint Communications Co. v. Cheney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.