US Sprint Communications Co. v. Cheney
This text of 5 F.3d 1503 (US Sprint Communications Co. v. Cheney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
5 F.3d 1503
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
U.S. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense and Andrew Card, Acting
Secretary of Transportation, Appellees,
and
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., Intervenor.
No. 92-1470.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 15, 1993.
Before (MAYER, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge):
Judgment
PER CURIAM:
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 F.3d 1503, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17930, 1993 WL 264957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-sprint-communications-co-v-cheney-cafc-1993.