U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No 10268L170237
This text of U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No 10268L170237 (U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No 10268L170237) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: 9/20/ 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- X U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, : : Plaintiff, : -against- : : 23-CV-8250 (VEC) : CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S : ORDER LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO : 10268L170237, : : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------- X VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: WHEREAS on September 19, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendants Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London Subscribing to Policy No. 10268L170237, Dkt. 1; WHEREAS Plaintiff alleges that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction in this matter based on diversity, id. ¶ 7; WHEREAS, “[a]s an unincorporated business organization, Lloyd’s has the citizenship of each of its members,” so “diversity turns on the citizenships of . . . the unidentified underwriters.” Prime Prop. & Cas. Ins. Inc. v. Elantra Logistics LLC, No. 20 CIV. 5737 (JPC), 2021 WL 4066737, at *2–3 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2021) (citing E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Lloyd’s & Cos., 241 F.3d 154 (2d Cir. 2001)); see also Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Aldridge, 906 F. Supp. 870, 872 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (“The citizenship of a Lloyd’s syndicate is measured by the citizenship of the individual [underwriters] who are responsible for their proportional share of the specific insurance in question.”); WHEREAS a complaint premised upon diversity of citizenship must allege the citizenship of each underwriter subscribing to a Lloyd’s policy, see Prime Prop. & Cas. Ins. Inc., 2021 WL 4066737, at *3 (dismissing the complaint without prejudice where the plaintiff “has not sufficiently pleaded diversity” of the individual underwriters”); WHEREAS the Complaint alleges that, “[u]pon information and belief, Defendant, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London Subscribing to Policy No. 10268L170237, is comprised of members of individual syndicates subscribing to Policy No. 10268L170237 and whose principal place of business is located in London, United Kingdom,” see Dkt. 1 4 6; and WHEREAS the Complaint made no allegations as to the citizenship of the members of said Defendant; and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than Wednesday, October 4, 2023, Defendants must file an Amended Complaint that cures the deficiencies described herein or the matter will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
SO ORDERED. □ . Vole (or Date: September 20, 2023 VALERIE CAPRONI New York, New York United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No 10268L170237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-specialty-insurance-company-v-certain-underwriters-at-lloyds-london-nysd-2023.