U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics - supplemental opinion

302 Neb. 283
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 2019
DocketS-17-1101
StatusPublished

This text of 302 Neb. 283 (U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics - supplemental opinion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics - supplemental opinion, 302 Neb. 283 (Neb. 2019).

Opinion

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/10/2019 09:07 AM CDT

- 283 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 302 Nebraska R eports U.S. SPECIALTY INS. CO. v. D S AVIONICS Cite as 302 Neb. 283

U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, a corporation, appellee, v. D S Avionics Unlimited LLC, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___

Filed February 15, 2019. No. S-17-1101.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: Shelly R. Stratman, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overruled.

Thomas M. Locher, of Locher, Pavelka, Dostal, Braddy & Hammes, L.L.C., for appellant.

Robert E. O’Connor, Jr., for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, and Papik, JJ., and Johnson, District Judge.

Per Curiam. This case is before us on motions for rehearing filed by the appellant, D S Avionics Unlimited LLC, and the appellee, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, concerning our opinion in U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics.1 We overrule the motions, but we modify the opinion as follows:

1 U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics, 301 Neb. 388, 918 N.W.2d 589 (2018). - 284 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 302 Nebraska R eports U.S. SPECIALTY INS. CO. v. D S AVIONICS Cite as 302 Neb. 283

In the “Declaratory Judgment Was Premature” subsection, we strike the third sentence of the first paragraph, including footnote 14.2 Also in the same subsection, after the fourth sentence of the second paragraph,3 we insert the following sen- tence: “‘This rule embraces not only cases where the identi- cal issues between the same parties are sub judice, but also possibly cases in which the issues only are identical but not the parties.’”4 The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overruled.

2 Id. at 398, 918 N.W.2d at 596. 3 Id. at 399, 918 N.W.2d at 596. 4 Strawn v. County of Sarpy, 146 Neb. 783, 788, 21 N.W.2d 597, 600 (1946).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics Unlimited LLC
301 Neb. 388 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
Strawn v. County of Sarpy
21 N.W.2d 597 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 Neb. 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-specialty-ins-co-v-d-s-avionics-supplemental-opinion-neb-2019.