U.S. SECURITY ASSOCIATES, INC. v. EDUARDO FERNANDEZ

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 14, 2022
Docket22-0833
StatusPublished

This text of U.S. SECURITY ASSOCIATES, INC. v. EDUARDO FERNANDEZ (U.S. SECURITY ASSOCIATES, INC. v. EDUARDO FERNANDEZ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. SECURITY ASSOCIATES, INC. v. EDUARDO FERNANDEZ, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed December 14, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-833 Lower Tribunal No. 20-22163 ________________

U.S. Security Associates, Inc., et al., Appellants,

vs.

Eduardo Fernandez, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami- Dade County, Charles Johnson, Judge.

Carlton Fields, P.A., and Matthew J. Conigliaro (Tampa); and Adams | Coogler, P.A., and Robert L. Newman (West Palm Beach), for appellants.

Joel S. Perwin, P.A., and Joel S. Perwin; Alan Goldfarb, P.A., and Alan Goldfarb; and Warrior Law, P.A., and Liah Catanese, for appellees.

Before EMAS, HENDON and MILLER, JJ.

HENDON, J. Affirmed. S. Fla. Coastal Elec., Inc. v. Treasures on Bay II Condo

Ass'n, Inc., 89 So. 3d 264, 267 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“In examining whether

agency exists, the principal's actions are the primary indication of the

relationship, and such examination is generally done by the trier of fact

unless there is indisputably no connection between the principal and the

agent.”); M.S. v. Nova S.E. Univ. Inc., 881 So. 2d 614, 617 (Fla. 4th DCA

2004) (“If the evidence raises any issue of material fact, if it is conflicting, if

it will permit different reasonable inferences, or if it tends to prove the

issue, it should be submitted to the jury as a question of fact to be

determined by it.”); G4S Secure Sols. (USA), Inc. v. Morrow, 210 So. 3d

92, 94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (holding while agency status is generally a

question of fact, it may be decided as a question of law “in those cases

where the party opposing summary judgment is unable to point to any

conflicting facts or inferences to be drawn from the facts.”); Gradia v.

Baptist Hosp., Inc., 345 So. 3d 385, 388 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022) (holding

evidence supporting either an independent contractor or an agency

relationship precluded summary judgment).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. v. Morrow
210 So. 3d 92 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
South Florida Coastal Electric, Inc. v. Treasures on the Bay II Condo Ass'n
89 So. 3d 264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
M.S. v. Nova Southeastern University Inc.
881 So. 2d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
U.S. SECURITY ASSOCIATES, INC. v. EDUARDO FERNANDEZ, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-security-associates-inc-v-eduardo-fernandez-fladistctapp-2022.