U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. SAExploration Holdings, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 15, 2023·No. 1:20-cv-08423·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:20-cv-8423-PGG -against-

SAEXPLORATION HOLDINGS, INC, et al.,

Defendants.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT BRIAN BEATTY

Plaintiff U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) respectfully moves for the entry of a consented-to proposed Final Judgment as to Defendant Brian Beatty. In support of this motion, the SEC states the following: 1. The SEC and Defendant Brian Beatty have reached a settlement, subject to the Court’s approval. 2. Submitted herewith as Exhibit 1 is the Consent of Defendant Brian Beatty, in which Mr. Beatty consents, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, to the entry of the proposed Final Judgment. 3. Submitted herewith as Exhibit 2 is the proposed Final Judgment as to Mr. Beatty, which would: (1) permanently enjoin Mr. Beatty from committing additional violations of the federal securities laws charged in the Complaint, namely, the antifraud, books and records, reporting, and internal controls provisions of the federal securities laws; (2) permanently bar Beatty from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. § 78l]; (3) provides for the disgorgement of $219,940 plus prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $41,763, for a total of $261,703; and (4) provides that Beatty shall reimburse SAExploration Holdings, Inc., pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [15 U.S.C. § 7243], in the amount of $441,995, to be paid by Beatty within one year of the Court’s entry of the Final Judgment against

Mr. Beatty. If the Court accepts the proposed settlement and enters the Proposed Final Judgment, that will resolve the case against Beatty. 4. The proposed Final Judgment as to Mr. Beatty is fair and reasonable and in the public interest. See SEC v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 752 F.3d 285, 294 (2d Cir. 2014). For the foregoing reasons, the SEC respectfully requests that the Court enter the Proposed Final Judgment by consent as to Defendant Brian Beatty.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Peter Lallas S. Yael Berger Dean Conway Peter Lallas Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F. Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549-5977 (202) 551-6864 lallasp@sec.gov Counsel for Plaintiff SEC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on November 14, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing Motion, including Exhibits 1 and 2, with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system.

/s/ Peter Lallas Peter Lallas

Counsel for Plaintiff U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -against- SAEXPLORATION HOLDINGS, INC., JEFFREY H. HASTINGS, BRENT N. WHITELEY, Civil Action No. 1:20-CV-8423 (PGG) BRIAN A. BEATTY, and MICHAEL J. SCOTT, Defendants, and THOMAS W. O’NEILL and LORI E. HASTINGS, Relief Defendants. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT BRIAN A. BEATTY 1. Defendant Brian A. Beatty (“Defendant”) acknowledges having been served with the Amended Complaint in this action, enters a general appearance, and admits the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and over the subject matter of this action. 2. Without admitting or denying the allegations of the Amended Complaint (except as provided herein in paragraph 11 and except as to personal and subject matter jurisdiction, which Defendant admits), Defendant hereby consents to the entry of the Final Judgment in the form attached hereto (the “Final Judgment”) and incorporated by reference herein, which, among other things: (a) permanently restrains and enjoins Defendant from violations of, and/or aiding and abetting violations of, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)]; and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]; Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, and 13a-13

thereunder [15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) and 17 C.F.R. §§ 240.12b-20, 240.13a-1, 240.13a-11, and 240.13a-13]; Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(2)(A)]; Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(2)(B)]; Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(5)]; Exchange Act Rule 13b2-1 [17 C.F.R. § 240.13b2-1]; Exchange Act Rule 13b2-2 [17 C.F.R. § 240.13b2-2]; Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 [17 C.F.R. § 240.13a-14]; and Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) [15 U.S.C. § 7243]; (b) prohibits Defendant from acting as a director or officer of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange

Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]; (c) orders Defendant to pay disgorgement in the amount of $219,940, plus prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $41,763, for a total of $261,703; and (d) orders Defendant to reimburse SAExploration Holdings, Inc., in the amount of $441,995, pursuant to Section 304(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [15 U.S.C. § 7243]. 3. Defendant agrees that he shall not seek or accept, directly or indirectly, reimbursement or indemnification from any source, including but not limited to payment made pursuant to any insurance policy, with regard to any amounts that Defendant reimburses SAExploration Holdings, Inc. pursuant to the Final Judgment and in accordance with Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

4. Defendant waives the entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 5. Defendant waives the right, if any, to a jury trial and to appeal from the entry of the Final Judgment. 6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. SAExploration Holdings, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. SAExploration Holdings, Inc. (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. SAExploration Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related