U.S. Rubber Recycling, Inc. v. Ecore International, Inc.

Federal Circuit

U.S. Rubber Recycling, Inc. v. Ecore International, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMay 8, 2013

Docket12-1166

StatusUnpublished

This text of U.S. Rubber Recycling, Inc. v. Ecore International, Inc. (U.S. Rubber Recycling, Inc. v. Ecore International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

U.S. Rubber Recycling, Inc. v. Ecore International, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

U.S. RUBBER RECYCLING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ECORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2012-1166 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 09-CV-9516, Judge James S. Otero. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

THOMAS A. VOGELE, Thomas Vogele & Associates, APC, of Costa Mesa, California, argued for plaintiff- appellant. With him on the brief was TIMOTHY M. KOWAL. Of counsel were YURI MIKULKA and DOUGLAS Q. HAHN, Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, of Newport Beach, California.

ROBERT C. NISSEN, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was JEFFREY D. WEXLER. Of counsel was WILLIAM T. ENOS. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 8, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI