U.S. Marine Corporation and Bayliner Marine Corporation, Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner, International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervening International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

916 F.2d 1183
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided October 18, 1990·No. 89-2051·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

916 F.2d 1183w

135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2885, 59 USLW 2344,
117 Lab.Cas. P 10,464

U.S. MARINE CORPORATION and Bayliner Marine Corporation,
Petitioners/Cross-Respondents,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner,
International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America,
AFL-CIO, et al., Intervening Respondent.
INTERNATIONAL UNION, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL WORKERS OF AMERICA,
AFL-CIO, et al., Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

Nos. 89-2051, 89-2140 and 89-2152.

United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.

Argued Dec. 5, 1989.
Decided Oct. 18, 1990.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

U.S. Marine Corporation and Bayliner Marine Corporation, Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner, International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervening International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, 916 F.2d 1183 (7th Cir. 1990).

916 F.2d 1183 (U.S. Marine Corporation and Bayliner Marine Corporation, Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner, International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervening International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Labor Relations Board v. PIE Nationwide, Inc.
923 F.2d 506 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)