U.S. Ice Cream Corp. v. Carvel Corp.

190 A.D.2d 790, 593 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1504
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in U.S. Ice Cream Corp. v. Carvel Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 A.D.2d 788

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for alleged violations of the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act, the defendant Carvel Corporation appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered March 30, 1992, as denied its motion for consolidation or a joint trial of this action with another action pending before the same court.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion for consolidation or for a joint trial of this action with another action pending before the court (see, CPLR 602 [a]; Continental Bldg. Co. v Town of N. Salem, 150 AD2d 518; cf., Zupich v Flushing Hosp. Med. Ctr., 156 AD2d 677). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

U.S. Ice Cream Corp. v. Carvel Corp., 190 A.D.2d 790, 593 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

190 A.D.2d 790 (U.S. Ice Cream Corp. v. Carvel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Continental Building Co. v. Town of North Salem
150 A.D.2d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Zupich v. Flushing Hospital and Medical Center
156 A.D.2d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)