US Ex Rel. Steven Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

US Ex Rel. Steven Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 3, 2014

Docket12-55396

StatusPublished

This text of US Ex Rel. Steven Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. (US Ex Rel. Steven Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

US Ex Rel. Steven Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVEN J. No. 12-55396 HARTPENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01885- v. GHK-AGR

KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC.; KCI-USA, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

UNITED STATES EX REL. GERALDINE No. 12-56117 GODECKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-06403- v. GHK-AGR

KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC.; KCI-USA, INC., ORDER Defendants-Appellees.

Filed December 3, 2014 2 U.S. EX REL HARTPENCE V. KINETIC CONCEPTS

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI