US Ex Rel. Steven Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2014·No. 12-55396·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 03 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES ex rel. STEVEN J. No. 12-55396 HARTPENCE, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01885-GHK-

Plaintiff - Appellant, AGR

v.

KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC.; KCI- ORDER USA, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

UNITED STATES ex rel. GERALDINE No. 12-56117 GODECKE, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-06403-GHK-

Plaintiff - Appellant, AGR

v.

KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC.; KCI- USA, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

Page 2

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

US Ex Rel. Steven Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., (9th Cir. 2014).

US Ex Rel. Steven Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. (US Ex Rel. Steven Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.