U.S. ex rel. Arcata & Mad River R. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n

290 U.S. 632, 54 S. Ct. 51
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 9, 1933
DocketNo. 90
StatusPublished

This text of 290 U.S. 632 (U.S. ex rel. Arcata & Mad River R. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. ex rel. Arcata & Mad River R. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 290 U.S. 632, 54 S. Ct. 51 (1933).

Opinion

Peti[633]*633tion for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied.

Messrs. Charles D. Drayton and Robert E. Quirk for petitioner. Messrs. H. L. Underwood and Daniel W. Knowlton for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 U.S. 632, 54 S. Ct. 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-ex-rel-arcata-mad-river-r-v-interstate-commerce-commn-scotus-1933.