U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP

District Court, S.D. West Virginia·Decided March 18, 2025·No. 5:23-cv-00623·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ) OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) and ) ) JANE DOE, ) ) Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-00623 v. ) Judge Frank W. Volk ) WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and ) JAMES BOWYER, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) CONSENT DECREE Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) instituted this action against Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (“Walmart”) to enforce the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). In its Complaint, EEOC pleaded claims that Walmart: (1) subjected Charging Party Doe to a hostile work environment because of sex (female); (2) subjected Doe to discharge in retaliation for engaging in protected activity and because of sex (female); and (3) subjected a class of aggrieved current and former female employees to a hostile work environment because of sex (female). Pursuant to rights conferred by Section 706(f)(1) of Title VII, on October 2, 2023, Doe (“Plaintiff-Intervenor”) intervened in the litigation concerning the Title VII claims that EEOC pleaded regarding her employment. On September 11, 2024, Plaintiff-Intervenor Doe filed an Amended Complaint. Defendant Walmart denies liability as to all counts in EEOC’s Complaint and Plaintiff- Intervenor’s Amended Complaint. As a result of settlement discussions, EEOC, Plaintiff-Intervenor Doe, and Walmart (“the Parties”) desire to resolve this action and Doe’s underlying charge of discrimination (Charge No. 533-2023-00737) without the time and expenditure ofcontestedlitigation. Accordingly, the Parties agree that this action should be resolved through entry of this Consent Decree (“Decree”). This Decree, once approved and entered by the Court, shall fully and finally resolve all claims asserted

against Walmart in EEOC’s Complaint and all claims asserted against Walmart in Plaintiff- Intervenor Doe’s Amended Complaint filed in this action. STIPULATIONS A. The Parties acknowledge the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia over the subject matter of this action and the Parties to this action for purposes of entering this Decree and, if necessary, enforcing this Decree. B. Venue is proper in this judicial district for purposes of entering this Decree and any proceedings related to enforcement of the Decree. C. The Parties agree that all conditions precedent to the institution of this action have

been fulfilled. FINDINGS Having carefully examined the terms and provisions of this Decree, and based on the pleadings and stipulations of the Parties, the Court finds the following: A. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the Parties in this action. B. The terms of the Decree are lawful, fair, adequate, reasonable, and just. C. The Decree conforms to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Title VII, and it is not in derogation of the rights or privileges of any person. The entry of this Decree will further the interests of Title VII and will be in the best interest of the Parties, those for whom EEOC seeks relief, and the public. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: DEFINITIONS A. As used in this Decree, the term “complaint” shall mean any allegation or report made by any person, whether or not substantiated by evidence, whether or not made in conformity

with Walmart’s established procedures (so long as knowledge of the complaint may be imputed to Walmart), made by any means of communication, regarding potential discrimination or harassment committed by any employee, officer, director, or customer of Walmart. B. The term “days” shall mean calendar days unless business days are clearly specified in a specific provision of the Decree. If any deadline referenced in this Decree shall fall on a weekend or a federal holiday, the deadline shall be moved to the next business day. C. The term “employee” shall be construed in accordance with applicable Title VII case law defining the meaning of the term “employee” and “employer.” The term “employee” shall specifically include all full-time and part-time employees of Walmart.

D. The term “Effective Date” shall be the date that the Court approves and enters this Decree as an order of the Court. E. The term “Responsible Official” shall mean any person holding the position of Market People Partner, People Operations Lead, People Lead, Human Resources Manager, or other comparable position with the primary responsibility of managing human resources for Walmart’s store located in Lewisburg, WV that presently bears the designation Store #1499, and any official within Walmart Ethics, Workplace Investigations, and/or Global Investigations exercising duties related to employee complaints of sex discrimination, sexual harassment, or related retaliation concerning Walmart’s store located in Lewisburg, WV that presently bears the designation Store #1499. F. As used in this Decree, the term “retaliation” means retaliationagainst an individual for reporting in good faith sex discrimination or sexual harassment, cooperating in a sex discrimination or sexual harassment investigation, opposing sex discrimination or sexual harassment, or filing or assisting another person in filing a complaint of sex discrimination or

sexual harassment with a government agency or court. EFFECTIVE DATE, DURATION, AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 1. This Decree shall become effective immediately upon the Effective Date and shall remain in effect until its expiration date, which shall be two (2) years immediately following the entry of the Decree. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, Paragraph 6 of this Decree shall continue in full force and effect after the expiration date and will remain binding on Walmart indefinitely. 2. Paragraph 6 of this Decree shall apply to all Walmart facilities and business operations. The remaining provisions of this Decree shall apply only to Walmart’s store located in

Lewisburg, WV that presently bears the designation Store #1499and any Responsible Official (as defined at Definition E above) exercising duties regarding Walmart’s store located in Lewisburg, WV that presently bears the designation Store #1499. 3. For the duration of this Decree, and indefinitely thereafter regarding the requirements set forth in Paragraph 6, the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the action to enforce the terms of the Decree and shall have all available remedies to enforce the Decree, including but not limited to monetary sanctions and injunctive relief. Should the Court determine that any party has not complied with this Consent Decree, appropriate relief, including but not limited to extension of the Consent Decree for such period as may be necessary to remedy its non- compliance, may be ordered. This Consent Decree is the result of negotiation and compromise among the parties of disputed claims and shall not be construed as evidence of any violations by Walmart of any federal statute, regulation, or common law obligation. INJUNCTION 4. Walmart, its officers, directors, agents, employees, successors, assigns, and all

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, (S.D.W. Va. 2025).

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vance v. Ball State Univ.
133 S. Ct. 2434 (Supreme Court, 2013)