U.S. Corrections Corp. v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations

Ohio Supreme Court

U.S. Corrections Corp. v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations

660 N.E.2d 1222, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1527, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2966

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 16, 1996

Docket94-1290

StatusPublished

This text of 660 N.E.2d 1222 (U.S. Corrections Corp. v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

U.S. Corrections Corp. v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations, 660 N.E.2d 1222, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1527, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2966 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton County, Nos. C-920814 and C-920820. On January 11, 1996, appellant Jerry Monahan filed a motion for a specific order that the Board of Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, pay appellant $120,870.32 for attorney fees incurred. On February 7,1996, appellant filed a motion requesting that this court hold in abeyance his motion for a specific order of payment. Appellant stated that he has agreed with counsel for the board of commissioners that the payment of the fees will be made in three equal monthly installments. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, effective February 15, 1996, that appellant’s motion for a specific order of payment shall be held in abeyance until appellant files a notice with this court that he has received the three monthly payments.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton County, Nos. C-920814 and C-920820. On January 11, 1996, appellant Jerry Monahan filed a motion for a specific order that the Board of Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, pay appellant $120,870.32 for attorney fees incurred. On February 7,1996, appellant filed a motion requesting that this court hold in abeyance his motion for a specific order of payment. Appellant stated that he has agreed with counsel for the board of commissioners that the payment of the fees will be made in three equal monthly installments. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, effective February 15, 1996, that appellant’s motion for a specific order of payment shall be held in abeyance until appellant files a notice with this court that he has received the three monthly payments.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

660 N.E.2d 1222, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1527, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-corrections-corp-v-ohio-dept-of-indus-relations-ohio-1996.