U.S. Co. v. Ind. Com.

230 P. 624, 76 Colo. 241
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedNovember 10, 1924
DocketNo. 11,042.
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 230 P. 624 (U.S. Co. v. Ind. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. Co. v. Ind. Com., 230 P. 624, 76 Colo. 241 (Colo. 1924).

Opinion

THIS case was here once before and we sent it back for more definite findings. U.S. F. Co. v. Ind. Com., 73 Colo. 90,213 P. 330, q. v.

The commission now finds, among other things, as follows: "January 11th, A. D. 1922, while performing his usual duties, in and about the plant of his employer he [the deceased employee] accidentally and unexpectedly inhaled an excessive amount of gas. This accident occurred shortly before 9:30 p. m. About 9:30 p. m. he was found unconscious in the upstairs portion of his employer's plant. He remained unconscious until his death, which occurred January 13th, A. D. 1922. His death was the proximate result of the excessive inhalation of the gas herein mentioned. His system had been subjected to the continued inhalation of such gas during the term of his employment; the excessive inhalation of such gas herein mentioned accelerated the fatal effect of such gas upon his system. His death would not have occurred at the place nor at the time had he not been exposed to the accidental and excessive inhalation of the gas herein mentioned."

These findings necessitate an award for the claimant. The deceased got an unexpected, excessive, accidental dose *Page 243 of gas, which, with his previous inhalations, produced death. His death would not have occurred when and where it did but for this unexpected inhalation. Since the draft of gas which killed him was accidental it is immaterial whether his health had been impaired by previous inhalations so that the final draft was rendered fatal. SeeEllermann v. Ind. Com., 73 Colo. 20, 22, 213 P. 120.

But the plaintiff in error says that there is no evidence to justify a finding that the final dose of gas was anything more than the end of a gradual accumulation of the bad effects of the daily breathing of gas in the works, and that it shows that such was the fact. We agree with the proposition that if this were clearly the case the commission and the district court were wrong, but we have read all the evidence and it shows that the deceased went to work at about 3 p. m., and at about 9:30, without previous warning, fell unconscious and died without regaining consciousness.

His physicians testified that, in their opinion, an inhalation greater than usual plus his condition from previous ones caused his death. We cannot say, therefore, that the findings are without evidence and so must leave them unchanged.

Judgment affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE ALLEN, sitting for MR. CHIEF JUSTICE TELLER and MR. JUSTICE WHITFORD concur. *Page 244

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aranbula v. Banner Min. Co.
161 P.2d 867 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1945)
Mitchell v. Industrial Commission
61 Ariz. 436 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1944)
Matter of Mitchell
150 P.2d 355 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1944)
Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co. v. Loyd
1943 OK 218 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1943)
Cason v. American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co.
32 F. Supp. 680 (D. Colorado, 1940)
Young v. Salt Lake City
90 P.2d 174 (Utah Supreme Court, 1939)
Hallenbeck v. Butler
74 P.2d 708 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1937)
Oldham v. Scofield & Welch
266 N.W. 480 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1936)
Industrial Commission v. Ule
48 P.2d 803 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1935)
Cannella v. Gulf Refining Co.
154 So. 406 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)
Allen v. Gettler
30 P.2d 1117 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1934)
C. S. Card Iron Works Co. v. Radovich
30 P.2d 1108 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1934)
Industrial Commission v. Palmer
185 N.E. 66 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1933)
Ramsay v. Sullivan Mining Co.
6 P.2d 856 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1931)
United States Gypsum Co. v. McMichael
1930 OK 541 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
Sullivan Mining Co. v. Aschenbach
33 F.2d 1 (Ninth Circuit, 1929)
Seattle Can Co. v. Department of Labor & Industries
265 P. 739 (Washington Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 P. 624, 76 Colo. 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-co-v-ind-com-colo-1924.