U.S. Boring & Tunneling, Inc. v. Proc Robinson Enterprises, Inc.
This text of 633 So. 2d 118 (U.S. Boring & Tunneling, Inc. v. Proc Robinson Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
U.S. Boring and Tunneling, Inc. appeals the final judgment in favor of Proc Robinson Enterprises, Inc. (Robinson) following the trial court’s grant of Robinson’s motion for directed verdict. We reverse because the trial court failed to consider the “changed conditions” clause of the contract. See Town of Longboat Key v. Carl E. Widell & Son, 362 So.2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). See also Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 18 Fla.L.Weekly D2301, 1993 WL 431973 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 26, 1993). We remand for a new trial.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
633 So. 2d 118, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2508, 1994 WL 84190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-boring-tunneling-inc-v-proc-robinson-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-1994.