U.S. Boring & Tunneling, Inc. v. Proc Robinson Enterprises, Inc.

633 So. 2d 118, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2508, 1994 WL 84190
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 18, 1994
DocketNo. 93-874
StatusPublished

This text of 633 So. 2d 118 (U.S. Boring & Tunneling, Inc. v. Proc Robinson Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. Boring & Tunneling, Inc. v. Proc Robinson Enterprises, Inc., 633 So. 2d 118, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2508, 1994 WL 84190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

U.S. Boring and Tunneling, Inc. appeals the final judgment in favor of Proc Robinson Enterprises, Inc. (Robinson) following the trial court’s grant of Robinson’s motion for directed verdict. We reverse because the trial court failed to consider the “changed conditions” clause of the contract. See Town of Longboat Key v. Carl E. Widell & Son, 362 So.2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). See also Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 18 Fla.L.Weekly D2301, 1993 WL 431973 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 26, 1993). We remand for a new trial.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town of Longboat Key v. Carl E. Widell & Son
362 So. 2d 719 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 So. 2d 118, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2508, 1994 WL 84190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-boring-tunneling-inc-v-proc-robinson-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-1994.