U.S. Basket Co. v. United States

52 Cust. Ct. 558, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1300
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 12, 1964
DocketReap. Dec. 10753; Entry No. 3096-H
StatusPublished

This text of 52 Cust. Ct. 558 (U.S. Basket Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. Basket Co. v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 558, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1300 (cusc 1964).

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement enumerated on the attached Schedule, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of handbag baskets manufactured by Japan Braid Hat Mfg. Co., Ltd. of Japan and exported from Japan.
That all the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement was entered subsequent to February 27,1958.
[559]*559IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise the subject of the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule is not included on the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, required to be valued in accordance with Section 402(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoiced unit value, net packed.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal for re-appraisement may be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value is the invoiced unit value, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Cust. Ct. 558, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-basket-co-v-united-states-cusc-1964.