U.S. Bank v. Vair
This text of U.S. Bank v. Vair (U.S. Bank v. Vair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 22, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D15-889 Lower Tribunal No. 13-20429 ________________
U.S. Bank National Association, etc., Appellant,
vs.
Richard Vair and Betty Vair, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jacqueline Hogan Scola, Judge.
Burr & Forman, LLP, and Nicholas S. Agnello and Christine Irwin Parrish (Fort Lauderdale); Burr & Forman, LLP, and Reid S. Manley (Birmingham, Alabama), for appellant.
Richards Goldstein LLP, and Richard L. Richards and Jason Goldstein, for appellees.
Before SHEPHERD, SALTER and SCALES, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Relying on the original panel decision in Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas
v. Beauvais, the trial court entered a final judgment in favor of the defendants
below, Richard Vair and Betty Vair. In view of this Court’s recent en banc
decision in the Beauvais case, Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas v. Beauvais, No.
3D14-575 (Fla. 3d DCA April 13, 2016) (withdrawing and replacing the original
panel decision), we reverse the final judgment.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
U.S. Bank v. Vair, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-bank-v-vair-fladistctapp-2016.