U.S. Bank v. Downey

986 N.E.2d 29, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1412
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 24, 2013
Docket2013-0453
StatusPublished

This text of 986 N.E.2d 29 (U.S. Bank v. Downey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. Bank v. Downey, 986 N.E.2d 29, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1412 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 98598, 2013-Ohio-494. On motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

Kennedy and O’Neill, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion for stay and require a bond.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

U.S. Bank v. Downey
2013 Ohio 494 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
986 N.E.2d 29, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-bank-v-downey-ohio-2013.