U.S. Bank v. Downey

986 N.E.2d 29, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1412
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 2013·No. 2013-0453·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 98598, 2013-Ohio-494. On motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

Kennedy and O’Neill, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion for stay and require a bond.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

U.S. Bank v. Downey, 986 N.E.2d 29, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1412 (Ohio 2013).

986 N.E.2d 29 (U.S. Bank v. Downey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U.S. Bank v. Downey
2013 Ohio 494 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)