U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. ex rel. LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Dickey

280 F. Supp. 3d 237
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedNovember 20, 2017
DocketCivil Action No. 17-10009-PBS
StatusPublished

This text of 280 F. Supp. 3d 237 (U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. ex rel. LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Dickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. ex rel. LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Dickey, 280 F. Supp. 3d 237 (D. Mass. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Saris, C.J.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff U.S. Bank Trust,. N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust (“U.S. Bank”), filed this interpleader action (Docket No. 1-3) in Suffolk County Superior Court, pursuant to an order by the Boston Housing Court. U.S. Bank sought to have the state court decide the rights of Defendants James S. Dickey, Endeavor Capital Funding LLC f/k/a Capital Trust Funding LLC (“Endeavor Capital”), and the United States of America with respect to $440,893.64 in surplus funds from a foreclosure sale. On January 4, 2017, Defendant United States of America removed the case to this Court. Dickey then filed a counterclaim against U.S. Bank and a third-party complaint against 497 E. 4th Street LLC and Andrew Sche-na (Docket No. 23). A hearing on the pending motions was held on November 20, 2017.

ORDER

This interpleader action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court has not addressed the case on the merits.’ However, based on the parties’ representations at the hearing, Defendants’ individual claims to the surplus funds "do not exceed $440,893.64. An inter-pleader action is not appropriate under these circumstances where the claimants are not adverse. See Hudson Sav. Bank v. Austin, 479 F.3d 102, 107 (1st Cir. 2007) (“[I]nterpleader is not available unless the defendants’ claims are ‘adverse’ to each other.”.(citation omitted)); see also State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Tashire, 386 U.S. 523, 537, 87 S.Ct. 1199, 18 L.Ed.2d 270 (1967) (noting, that “federal interpleader was not intended to serve the function of a ‘bill of peace’ ”). For this reason, all claims and counterclaims in this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Tashire
386 U.S. 523 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Hudson Savings Bank v. United States
479 F.3d 102 (First Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 F. Supp. 3d 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-bank-trust-na-ex-rel-lsf9-master-participation-trust-v-dickey-mad-2017.